ExpertVendor-neutralOffSec· issued from US

OSWE

Offensive Security Web Expert

Advanced web application exploitation — whitebox review, vulnerability chain construction.

Exam fee
$1,699
Ongoing
$0/yr AMF · 30 CPE/yr
Study time
300–500 hrs
Delivery
Hands-on practical lab
Validity
3 yrs (renewal cycle)

› Quality score

32.5 / 40

Four-axis SecProve rubric, each 0–10. SecProve editorial assessment — each axis carries a written justification so you can push back on any single call without dismissing the whole score.

Blueprint rigor
How well-defined and rigorous the exam blueprint is.
Public WEB-300 syllabus; whitebox-review and chained-vuln objectives explicit.
8.5/10
Practical evidence
Hands-on labs / written reports vs pure MCQ.
47-hour live lab against modern web stacks plus a graded report. As real as web-pentest exams get.
9.5/10
Currency & upkeep
How aggressively content is kept current with the field.
WEB-300 refresh cadence is irregular but each refresh meaningful.
7.0/10
Market recognition
How often this signal actually moves a hiring decision.
Strong in offensive AppSec circles; growing but narrower than OSCP. [Holders: 3k, 2024-12]
7.5/10

› Market signals

public, citable inputs to the recognition score
Holders worldwide
3,000
as of 2024-12 · source

› Built for these roles

Application Security Engineer (offensive)Web App PentesterBug Bounty HunterRed Team Operator (web-track)

› Exam format

47-hour, 45-minute hands-on lab against multiple modern web stacks. Whitebox source review and chained vulnerabilities required. 24-hour report-writing window after the lab. Online proctored.

Passing score
Lab points-based (varies — typically 60+/100 with report)
Retake policy
Fee: $249 per attempt
Wait: 0d between attempts

Retake voucher $249 separately. No wait period beyond exam scheduling availability.

› Recertification

90 OffSec CE credits over the three-year cycle (avg 30/yr). No annual maintenance fee.

› NICE Framework work roles

The NIST NICE work-role IDs this cert maps to. NICCS lookup.

PD-WRL-007DD-WRL-005
Recognition
GlobalUSEUUK
Exam languages
en

› Core domains covered

The 2 domains this cert is centrally about. Passing the exam demonstrates working knowledge of each.

› Also touched

Present in the blueprint but not the primary focus — you’ll be introduced but shouldn’t expect depth.

› Prerequisites

Experience

Strong web AppSec background. Comfort reading + debugging code across multiple languages (PHP, Python, Node, .NET).

Knowledge assumed
  • Web application frameworks across multiple stacks
  • Deobfuscation and code review
  • Exploit chain construction

› Progression

requiredrecommended

Where this cert fits in the typical learning path. Required edges are vendor-gated; recommended edges reflect de facto industry progression.

Required prereqs (0)

No vendor-gated prereqs.

Recommended priors (2)
OSWE
OffSec
Required by (0)

No certs require this one.

Recommended next (1)

› Study materials

Curated starting points. Not exhaustive — vet each against your learning style and the current exam version.

› Version & lifecycle

Current version
WEB-300 (2024)
Released
2024-01

› Salary signal

Senior web/app pentester, US, 4-7 years.

$130K$195K
median $155K

Robert Half Salary Guide + Glassdoor 'Web Application Pentester' aggregations · 2024 · US base only · p25–p75 range

› How it compares

vs
eWPTX

Both are senior practical web-pentest exams; OSWE has wider hiring-manager recognition, eWPTX is similarly rigorous at lower price.

↔ Compare side-by-side
vs
OSCP

OSCP is generalist pentest; OSWE is web-app deep-dive. Common pairing.

↔ Compare side-by-side

› Careers that commonly pursue this cert

AppSec / DevSecOps Engineer

Embed security into the software development lifecycle. Shift left to catch vulnerabilities before they reach production.

Product Security Engineer

Embedded in a product team — owns threat modelling, secure design, libraries, dependency risk, and increasingly the AI-specific hardening of LLM features the product ships.

› Common exam traps to study

Cybersecurity cert exams reuse the same 25 distractor patterns over and over — category confusion, RTO vs RPO, IDS vs IPS, MD5 vs SHA-256, and more. Once you can name the trap, you stop falling for it. Each archetype page covers what it is, the specific pairs candidates confuse, and how to avoid it.

See this cert’s domains highlighted on the interactive map, or compare it against the rest of the catalog.